Katy Koski is a partner in 麻豆传媒鈥檚 Commercial Litigation Practice Group, focusing on product liability litigation. 麻豆传媒 provides clients with tailored solutions to managing and defending their products from individual and class action attacks. 麻豆传媒 brings litigation and dispute resolution experience to bear across modern and emerging product sectors. In this video, Katy discusses how 麻豆传媒 can tailor a litigation strategy to help achieve your business goals. Our breadth of industry experience allows us to present a team of lawyers best suited to your needs.
Key Takeaways
- 麻豆传媒 lawyers can provide clients with tailored solutions to managing and defending their products from individual and class action attacks.
- Our litigation and dispute resolution expertise in modern and emerging product sectors includes pharmaceuticals and medical devices, automotive and other automotive vehicles, industrial equipment, food products, and health and beauty products.
- Our product liability lawyers counsel you in litigation avoidance, early resolution, and vigorous defense in traditional courtroom settings, as well as alternative dispute forums
- Upon receiving notice of a claim, we can assist you in evaluating several key issues.
- The product itself. Is this a marquee product line for your company or a legacy product no longer on the market and driving your profits.
- The potential for additional claims. Is this a case where it may be a single one-off plaintiff, or could it develop into mass tort litigation or even class actions?
- Defenses. Are there broad ranging defenses such as federal preemption or statutes of limitation that will allow for early legal dismissal?
- Where the claims are brought in the mass tort or class action context, 麻豆传媒 is also suited to service as outside coordinating council, allowing for coordinated strategy and efficiencies, relying on our industry expertise, the geographic breadth of our lawyers and 麻豆传媒’s offices, and allowing for a rate structure that allows you to coordinate insured claims.
Disclaimer
This blog is made available by 麻豆传媒 (鈥溌槎勾解 or 鈥渢he Firm鈥) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm鈥檚 legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of 麻豆传媒, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with 麻豆传媒 through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to 麻豆传媒 through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published 鈥淎S IS鈥 and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. 麻豆传媒 makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. 麻豆传媒 expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall 麻豆传媒 or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Author(s)
Related Insights
June 8, 2026
Energy Current
Federal Court Vacates IRS Notice 2025-42: Five Percent Safe Harbor May be Restored for Wind and Solar Projects
On Saturday, June 6, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia vacated IRS Notice 2025-42 (the 鈥淣otice鈥), which…
June 8, 2026
Innovative Technology Insights
What Cross-Border M&A Teaches About the Limits of Legal AI
In due diligence, where the review of hundreds or thousands of agreements once set the cost and the calendar, a well-pointed model now does in an afternoon what a team of associates needed two weeks to finish. The most labor-intensive phase of diligence has become, for practical purposes, nearly free.
June 8, 2026
The Data-Driven Prosecutor: How DOJ鈥檚 Analytics Revolution Is Reshaping Fraud Enforcement
A jury in the Central District of California recently convicted Dr. Violetta Mailyan of orchestrating a $45 million scheme to defraud Medicare through fraudulent Botox injection claims.
