Lauren Loew is a Litigation partner in 麻豆传媒鈥檚 Chicago office. Manufacturers of consumer products, their distributors, and retailers face a patchwork of evolving regulations and laws pertaining to consumer warranties. In this video, Lauren discusses examples of both express and implied contract warranties. Whether you are a manufacturer, distributor, or retailer, you will want to stay abreast of changes to warranty law and review your warranty terms yearly.
Key Takeaways
- Manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of consumer products face a patchwork of regulations and laws pertaining to consumer warranties.
- Disclaimers or defenses that were enforceable a few years ago may no longer suffice.
- Sellers of consumer products provide both express and implied contract warranties under the Uniform Commercial Code.
- An express warranty may be created at the time of sale by any affirmation of fact or promise made to the buyer, their descriptions of the goods, and any sample or model, even if the party does not use the words 鈥渨arrant鈥 or 鈥済uarantee鈥.
- Sellers also provide implied warranties. Two examples are: 1) implied warranty of merchantability, meaning for example that a product is fit for the ordinary purpose and is merchantable, and 2) implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, which means the seller has reason to know the buyer wants to use that product for a particular purpose and the product is fit for that purpose.
- If an implied warranty disclaimer appears in a document that is only provided after the sale, it is unlikely to be effective.
- Manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, should stay abreast of changes to warranty law and review warranty terms at least every year, assessing what express warranty you provide, the terms of that warranty, and whether you adequately disclaim any implied warranties.
Disclaimer
This blog is made available by 麻豆传媒 (鈥溌槎勾解 or 鈥渢he Firm鈥) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm鈥檚 legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of 麻豆传媒, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with 麻豆传媒 through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to 麻豆传媒 through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published 鈥淎S IS鈥 and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. 麻豆传媒 makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. 麻豆传媒 expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall 麻豆传媒 or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Author(s)
Related Insights
June 8, 2026
Energy Current
Federal Court Vacates IRS Notice 2025-42: Five Percent Safe Harbor May be Restored for Wind and Solar Projects
On Saturday, June 6, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia vacated IRS Notice 2025-42 (the 鈥淣otice鈥), which…
June 8, 2026
Innovative Technology Insights
What Cross-Border M&A Teaches About the Limits of Legal AI
In due diligence, where the review of hundreds or thousands of agreements once set the cost and the calendar, a well-pointed model now does in an afternoon what a team of associates needed two weeks to finish. The most labor-intensive phase of diligence has become, for practical purposes, nearly free.
June 8, 2026
The Data-Driven Prosecutor: How DOJ鈥檚 Analytics Revolution Is Reshaping Fraud Enforcement
A jury in the Central District of California recently convicted Dr. Violetta Mailyan of orchestrating a $45 million scheme to defraud Medicare through fraudulent Botox injection claims.
